Shades

ByApfelbaum

Another area of catalog inconsistency concerns shades. Generally speaking, Scott lists all shades of a stamp as minor (that is “a”) numbers. If a stamp is issued in rose, the major catalog listing is for rose and all of the shades of rose from dark rose to scarlet are listed as minor numbers. Only when a color is truly changed, say from red to blue, does the catalog give that stamp a different major number. This is a pretty good system as it lets general collectors concentrate on getting the major different stamps while allowing specialists to concentrate on shade varieties. In a few areas this breaks down and one of those areas is Canada #16-17. Pictured above is #16 along with a few other of the 10c shades that are listed as varieties of #17. This is a stamp that has scores of shade varieties. Indeed red lilacs tend to be among the most variety prone of all stamp shades (look at the plethora of varieties on US #70 and 78) as the ink changes a bit over time and it seems that almost every batch of ink produced a new shade.

 The difference between a major number and a minor number is not a trivial academic matter. Major numbers are needed by all collectors for completion and have spaces in all the major stamp albums. Minor numbers have only a few collectors searching for them so the difference in price is significant. Canada #16 catalogs for $5500 whereas many of the shades of #17 which are just as scarce catalog for $160. Why do some stamps get this special status? As far as I can tell (and I know this sounds cynical) it is philatelic politics. In the old days of the hobby when numbers were being assigned it really mattered who went to bat for which stamp and this was usually a factor of whether that collector owned the stamp in question or not. Today these catalog quirks have been enshrined in our hobby and are rarely noticed. But they are residuals of a day when the self interest of the editors had great influence on the listings.

Similar Posts

Stellaland

ByApfelbaum

The political history of South Africa is fascinating. Originally settled by the Dutch in the sixteenth century, South African areas long bounced back and forth under control of the Boers (as the native Dutch decedents were called), the British, who added South Africa to their list of imperial ambitions in the eighteenth century, and native…

New Collectors

ByApfelbaum

The growth of Asian philately has undermined traditional thinking about where new collectors come from. The traditional model has been the evolutionary model- children (usually boys) introduced to the hobby and collecting in their youth become re enamored with stamps in middle to old age. This paradigm has described the traditional collecting arc in the…

Default and Philately

ByApfelbaum

Perhaps the most ridiculous man made disaster of our lifetime is closer and closer to coming about. I have refrained from writing about it as it seemed inconceivable that the United States House of Representatives would actually renege on the debts and legal obligations of the United States. This is the same group who is…

Stamps as Propaganda

Stamps as Propaganda

ByApfelbaum

When the Nazis took power in Germany in 1933, it didn’t take them long to completely alter the stamp issuing policy of the Wiemar Republic. Perhaps most illustrative of the change is the Wagner set issued within a few months of the Nazi takeover of the German government. Wiemar stamps are calm and placid with…

Color

Color

ByApfelbaum

Philatelic colors often have a nomenclature that is unique to the philatelic field and often the term for shades varies from philatelic specialty to philatelic specialty depending on the whim (and translations from the early foreign catalogs) of the early Scott compilers. The color terms are usually consistent within each country-the dull red of the…